- Home
- KMI vs PFLT Comparison
KMI vs PFLT Comparison
Compare KMI & PFLT Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | KMI | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1936 | 2010 |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Employees | N/A | N/A |
| Industry | Natural Gas Distribution | Finance: Consumer Services |
| Sector | Utilities | Finance |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 59.5B | 892.0M |
| IPO Year | 2011 | N/A |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | KMI | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $26.56 | $9.03 |
| Analyst Decision | Buy | Buy |
| Analyst Count | 13 | 6 |
| Target Price | ★ $31.62 | $10.75 |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | ★ 13.1M | 927.2K |
| Earning Date | 01-21-2026 | 11-24-2025 |
| Dividend Yield | 4.42% | ★ 13.62% |
| EPS Growth | ★ 7.28 | N/A |
| EPS | ★ 1.22 | 0.72 |
| Revenue | ★ $16,416,000,000.00 | $261,427,000.00 |
| Revenue This Year | $12.25 | $11.01 |
| Revenue Next Year | $4.65 | $0.14 |
| P/E Ratio | $21.71 | ★ $12.59 |
| Revenue Growth | 8.35 | ★ 40.28 |
| 52 Week Low | $23.94 | $8.40 |
| 52 Week High | $31.48 | $11.50 |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | KMI | PFLT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 45.82 | 39.15 |
| Support Level | $26.24 | $9.14 |
| Resistance Level | $26.86 | $9.62 |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 0.50 | 0.15 |
| MACD | -0.08 | -0.05 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 18.26 | 1.65 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout KMI Kinder Morgan Inc.
Kinder Morgan operates natural gas, crude oil, and refined products pipelines connecting producing regions to demand centers. It is principally involved in the gathering, storage, and transmission of natural gas across the continental United States. It also operates distribution centers for refined products along with the largest fleet of Jones Act-compliant tankers.
About PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd is a closed-end, externally managed, non-diversified investment company. Its investment objectives are to generate current income and capital appreciation by investing in Floating Rate Loans and other investments made to U.S. middle-market companies. The company believes that Floating Rate Loans to U.S. middle-market companies offer attractive risk-reward to investors due to the limited amount of capital available for such companies and the potential for rising interest rates. The company generate revenue in the form of interest income on the debt securities and dividends.