- Home
- KIM vs ONON Comparison
KIM vs ONON Comparison
Compare KIM & ONON Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Current Price
Current Price
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | KIM | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1958 | 2010 |
| Country | United States | Switzerland |
| Employees | N/A | N/A |
| Industry | Real Estate Investment Trusts | Shoe Manufacturing |
| Sector | Real Estate | Consumer Discretionary |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 14.1B | 14.8B |
| IPO Year | 1991 | 2021 |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | KIM | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $20.15 | $48.83 |
| Analyst Decision | Buy | Strong Buy |
| Analyst Count | 11 | 21 |
| Target Price | $24.45 | ★ $62.57 |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | 4.5M | ★ 6.1M |
| Earning Date | 10-30-2025 | 11-12-2025 |
| Dividend Yield | ★ 5.16% | N/A |
| EPS Growth | 57.13 | ★ 74.51 |
| EPS | 0.83 | ★ 0.84 |
| Revenue | $2,123,057,000.00 | ★ $3,607,815,596.00 |
| Revenue This Year | $5.64 | $31.86 |
| Revenue Next Year | $3.02 | $22.90 |
| P/E Ratio | ★ $24.24 | $57.74 |
| Revenue Growth | 8.14 | ★ 33.26 |
| 52 Week Low | $17.93 | $34.38 |
| 52 Week High | $25.06 | $64.05 |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | KIM | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 43.69 | 67.36 |
| Support Level | $19.76 | $45.83 |
| Resistance Level | $20.47 | $48.16 |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 0.27 | 1.70 |
| MACD | 0.01 | 0.50 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 36.62 | 86.89 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout KIM Kimco Realty Corporation (HC)
One of the oldest real estate investment trusts in the United States, Kimco Realty owns interests in 567 shopping centers throughout major markets in the US, representing roughly 101 million square feet.
About ONON On Holding AG
On Holding AG is a premium performance sports brand rooted in technology, design, and impact. Its shoes, apparel, and accessories products are designed predominantly for athletic use, casual, or leisure purposes. It does not manufacture the products or the raw materials and relies instead on third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers. Geographically, it derives a majority of its revenue from the Americas and rest from Europe, Middle East and Africa and Asia-Pacific region.