- Home
- KIM vs FFIV Comparison
KIM vs FFIV Comparison
Compare KIM & FFIV Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Current Price
Current Price
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | KIM | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1958 | 1996 |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Employees | N/A | N/A |
| Industry | Real Estate Investment Trusts | Computer Communications Equipment |
| Sector | Real Estate | Telecommunications |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 15.3B | 14.9B |
| IPO Year | N/A | 1999 |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | KIM | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $22.59 | $279.88 |
| Analyst Decision | Buy | Hold |
| Analyst Count | 14 | 10 |
| Target Price | $24.36 | ★ $305.50 |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | ★ 5.5M | 838.2K |
| Earning Date | 01-01-0001 | 04-28-2026 |
| Dividend Yield | ★ 4.61% | N/A |
| EPS Growth | N/A | ★ 23.56 |
| EPS | N/A | ★ 3.10 |
| Revenue | N/A | ★ $3,088,072,000.00 |
| Revenue This Year | $3.59 | $8.00 |
| Revenue Next Year | $3.07 | $3.27 |
| P/E Ratio | ★ $27.76 | $90.04 |
| Revenue Growth | N/A | ★ 9.66 |
| 52 Week Low | $17.93 | $223.76 |
| 52 Week High | $23.22 | $346.00 |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | KIM | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 66.69 | 55.63 |
| Support Level | $22.47 | $267.62 |
| Resistance Level | $23.22 | $284.98 |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 0.43 | 8.62 |
| MACD | 0.09 | -0.19 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 79.70 | 84.39 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout KIM Kimco Realty Corporation (HC)
One of the oldest real estate investment trusts in the United States, Kimco Realty owns interests in 564 shopping centers throughout major markets in the US, representing roughly 100 million square feet.
About FFIV F5 Inc.
F5 is a market leader in the application delivery controller market. The company sells products for security, application performance, and automation. Its three customer verticals are enterprises, service providers, and government entities. Revenue is evenly split between its services business and products business with revenue trending toward products due to software adoption. The Seattle-based firm was incorporated in 1996, and went public in 1999.