- Home
- EFT vs BGT Comparison
EFT vs BGT Comparison
Compare EFT & BGT Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | EFT | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2004 |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Employees | N/A | N/A |
| Industry | Finance Companies | Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable |
| Sector | Finance | Finance |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 304.1M | 320.3M |
| IPO Year | N/A | N/A |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | EFT | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $11.47 | $11.63 |
| Analyst Decision | | |
| Analyst Count | 0 | 0 |
| Target Price | N/A | N/A |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | 100.8K | ★ 107.2K |
| Earning Date | 01-01-0001 | 01-01-0001 |
| Dividend Yield | 10.63% | ★ 10.77% |
| EPS Growth | N/A | N/A |
| EPS | ★ 1.73 | N/A |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A |
| Revenue This Year | N/A | N/A |
| Revenue Next Year | N/A | N/A |
| P/E Ratio | $7.62 | ★ N/A |
| Revenue Growth | N/A | N/A |
| 52 Week Low | $11.10 | $10.89 |
| 52 Week High | $13.44 | $13.42 |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | EFT | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 64.20 | 65.39 |
| Support Level | $11.45 | $11.58 |
| Resistance Level | $11.60 | $11.38 |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| MACD | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 84.62 | 84.21 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout EFT Eaton Vance Floating Rate Income Trust of Beneficial Interest
Eaton Vance Floating-rate Income Trust is a closed-end management investment company. The company's objective is to provide a high level of current income and its secondary objective is capital appreciation.
About BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
Blackrock Floating Rate Income Trust is a closed-end management investment company. Its investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The company's secondary investment objective is to seek the preservation of capital. The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing mainly, under normal conditions, at least 80% of its assets in floating and variable rate instruments of U.S. and non-U.S. issuers, including a substantial portion of its assets in floating and variable rate securities including senior secured floating rate loans made to corporate and other business entities.