- Home
- CSQ vs USAC Comparison
CSQ vs USAC Comparison
Compare CSQ & USAC Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | CSQ | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2003 | 1998 |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Employees | N/A | N/A |
| Industry | Finance Companies | Natural Gas Distribution |
| Sector | Finance | Utilities |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 3.0B | 2.8B |
| IPO Year | N/A | N/A |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | CSQ | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $19.28 | $25.71 |
| Analyst Decision | | Hold |
| Analyst Count | 0 | 3 |
| Target Price | N/A | ★ $25.67 |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | 220.3K | ★ 244.3K |
| Earning Date | 01-01-0001 | 02-17-2026 |
| Dividend Yield | 7.53% | ★ 8.32% |
| EPS Growth | N/A | ★ 43.67 |
| EPS | N/A | ★ 0.81 |
| Revenue | N/A | ★ $991,507,000.00 |
| Revenue This Year | N/A | $7.21 |
| Revenue Next Year | N/A | $23.45 |
| P/E Ratio | ★ N/A | $31.20 |
| Revenue Growth | N/A | ★ 6.66 |
| 52 Week Low | $12.50 | $21.59 |
| 52 Week High | $16.45 | $30.10 |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | CSQ | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 50.53 | 64.50 |
| Support Level | $19.27 | $24.32 |
| Resistance Level | $19.54 | $25.56 |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 0.22 | 0.57 |
| MACD | -0.02 | 0.02 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 42.77 | 83.44 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The fund's objective is to provide total return through a combination of capital appreciation and current income. Its investment portfolio comprises equities, convertible securities, and high-yield corporate bonds.
About USAC USA Compression Partners LP
USA Compression Partners LP provides compression services in the United States in terms of total compression fleet horsepower to customers relating to infrastructure applications, including both allowing for the processing and transportation of natural gas through the domestic pipeline system and enhancing crude oil production through artificial lift processes. It engineers, designs, operates, services, and repairs its compression units and maintains related support inventory and equipment. The company provides compression services in several shale plays throughout the U.S., including the Utica, Marcellus, Permian, Denver-Julesburg, Eagle Ford, Mississippi Lime, Granite Wash, Woodford, Barnett, and Haynesville.