- Home
- CNS vs PPLI Comparison
CNS vs PPLI Comparison
Compare CNS & PPLI Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Current Price
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | CNS | PPLI |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1986 | N/A |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Employees | N/A | N/A |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Computer Software: Programming Data Processing |
| Sector | Finance | Technology |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 3.7B | 3.2B |
| IPO Year | 2004 | N/A |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | CNS | PPLI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $74.75 | N/A |
| Analyst Decision | Hold | |
| Analyst Count | 2 | 0 |
| Target Price | ★ $71.50 | N/A |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | ★ 200.1K | N/A |
| Earning Date | 04-16-2026 | N/A |
| Dividend Yield | ★ 3.96% | N/A |
| EPS Growth | N/A | N/A |
| EPS | ★ 0.82 | N/A |
| Revenue | ★ $427,536,000.00 | N/A |
| Revenue This Year | $4.71 | N/A |
| Revenue Next Year | $4.37 | N/A |
| P/E Ratio | $91.01 | ★ N/A |
| Revenue Growth | ★ 4.07 | N/A |
| 52 Week Low | $58.39 | N/A |
| 52 Week High | $78.81 | N/A |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | CNS | PPLI |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 56.66 | N/A |
| Support Level | $59.88 | N/A |
| Resistance Level | $78.69 | N/A |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 2.05 | 0.00 |
| MACD | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 64.29 | 0.00 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout CNS Cohen & Steers Inc
Cohen & Steers is a niche asset manager concentrating on real estate securities. The firm invests mainly in the equity shares of real estate investment trusts, with holdings in domestic and international real estate securities accounting for around two-thirds of its $98.4 billion in managed assets at the end of February. Cohen & Steers also manages portfolios dedicated to preferred securities, utilities stocks, and other high-yield offerings. The firm's distribution is balanced among its closed-end funds, open-end funds, and institutional accounts. During the past four calendar quarters, the company garnered 39% (25%) of its managed assets (base management fees) from institutional clients, 48% (55%) from open-end funds, and 13% (20%) from closed-end funds.