- Home
- CMS vs ONON Comparison
CMS vs ONON Comparison
Compare CMS & ONON Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Current Price
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | CMS | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1987 | 2010 |
| Country | United States | Switzerland |
| Employees | 8324 | N/A |
| Industry | Power Generation | Shoe Manufacturing |
| Sector | Utilities | Consumer Discretionary |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 21.2B | 14.8B |
| IPO Year | N/A | 2021 |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | CMS | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $69.75 | $48.83 |
| Analyst Decision | Buy | Strong Buy |
| Analyst Count | 13 | 21 |
| Target Price | ★ $79.08 | $62.57 |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | 2.0M | ★ 6.1M |
| Earning Date | 10-30-2025 | 11-12-2025 |
| Dividend Yield | ★ 3.11% | N/A |
| EPS Growth | N/A | ★ 74.51 |
| EPS | ★ 3.47 | 0.84 |
| Revenue | ★ $8,295,000,000.00 | $3,607,815,596.00 |
| Revenue This Year | $9.21 | $31.86 |
| Revenue Next Year | $3.75 | $22.90 |
| P/E Ratio | ★ $20.13 | $57.74 |
| Revenue Growth | 10.96 | ★ 33.26 |
| 52 Week Low | $63.97 | $34.38 |
| 52 Week High | $76.45 | $64.05 |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | CMS | ONON |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 31.42 | 67.36 |
| Support Level | $69.33 | $45.83 |
| Resistance Level | $70.65 | $48.16 |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 1.03 | 1.70 |
| MACD | -0.43 | 0.50 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 9.54 | 86.89 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout CMS CMS Energy Corporation
CMS Energy is an energy holding company with three principal businesses. Its regulated utility, Consumers Energy, provides regulated natural gas service to 1.8 million customers and electric service to 1.9 million customers in Michigan. NorthStar Clean Energy, formerly CMS Enterprises, is engaged in wholesale power generation, including contracted renewable energy. CMS sold EnerBank in October 2021.
About ONON On Holding AG
On Holding AG is a premium performance sports brand rooted in technology, design, and impact. Its shoes, apparel, and accessories products are designed predominantly for athletic use, casual, or leisure purposes. It does not manufacture the products or the raw materials and relies instead on third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers. Geographically, it derives a majority of its revenue from the Americas and rest from Europe, Middle East and Africa and Asia-Pacific region.