- Home
- AAMI vs MQ Comparison
AAMI vs MQ Comparison
Compare AAMI & MQ Stocks: Price Trends, ML Decisions, Charts, Trends, Technical Analysis and more.
Current Price
Company Overview
Basic Information| Metric | AAMI | MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1980 | 2010 |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Employees | N/A | N/A |
| Industry | Investment Managers | Computer Software: Prepackaged Software |
| Sector | Finance | Technology |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Market Cap | 1.9B | 2.0B |
| IPO Year | N/A | 2021 |
Fundamental Metrics
Financial Performance| Metric | AAMI | MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $55.61 | $4.48 |
| Analyst Decision | Hold | Hold |
| Analyst Count | 3 | 9 |
| Target Price | ★ $48.67 | $5.25 |
| AVG Volume (30 Days) | 186.2K | ★ 3.1M |
| Earning Date | 02-05-2026 | 02-24-2026 |
| Dividend Yield | ★ 0.07% | N/A |
| EPS Growth | ★ 45.00 | N/A |
| EPS | ★ 2.40 | N/A |
| Revenue | $559,300,000.00 | ★ $588,561,000.00 |
| Revenue This Year | $17.23 | $25.90 |
| Revenue Next Year | $24.02 | $17.88 |
| P/E Ratio | $22.91 | ★ N/A |
| Revenue Growth | 19.25 | ★ 20.11 |
| 52 Week Low | $22.60 | $3.48 |
| 52 Week High | $55.38 | $7.04 |
Technical Indicators
Market Signals| Indicator | AAMI | MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Strength Index (RSI) | 75.56 | 41.92 |
| Support Level | $52.00 | $4.29 |
| Resistance Level | $55.10 | $4.49 |
| Average True Range (ATR) | 1.99 | 0.18 |
| MACD | 0.44 | -0.03 |
| Stochastic Oscillator | 92.66 | 29.57 |
Price Performance
Historical ComparisonAbout AAMI Acadian Asset Management Inc.
Acadian Asset Management Inc is a holding company that operates a systematic investment management business through its subsidiary, that offers institutional investors across the globe access to a diversified array of systematic investment strategies designed to meet a range of risk and return objectives.
About MQ Marqeta Inc.
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.